Reengineering the Thought Process
I came across a very interesting story in my English textbook, that got me thinking some about some serious stuff. The basic premise of the tale was that judging people based on physical appearance is wrong, and that people we judge to be "good" must be of great mental strength, and have a "good" personality. But why? These adjectives that we are supposed to attribute to "good people" (like honesty, character, etc.) are, at the base of it, completely arbitrary. (The truth of the matter is that most of us would prefer style over substance, but that's not what I am interested in, now) I am asking a more basic and fundamental question, "Why are these qualities called desirable, and others undesirable?" I mean, why do we think of Lincoln and Gandhi as good, and Hitler and Napoleon as bad? The obvious answer of course, is "because of what they did." In other words, their actions. But what makes these actions good an...